<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Is English The Universal Language?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://foxnomad.com/2009/05/21/is-english-the-universal-language/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://foxnomad.com/2009/05/21/is-english-the-universal-language/</link>
	<description>tech and tips to help you travel smarter</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Feb 2014 11:19:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Anil Polat		</title>
		<link>https://foxnomad.com/2009/05/21/is-english-the-universal-language/#comment-43129</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anil Polat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 12:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foxnomad.com/?p=3405#comment-43129</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://foxnomad.com/2009/05/21/is-english-the-universal-language/#comment-43087&quot;&gt;marina k. villatoro&lt;/a&gt;.

It&#039;s a shame to miss out on the cultural perspective that a second language can give you - but is English the universal language? It is *the* language to know if you don&#039;t?

Depends, of course, but if you could only use 1 language before setting off on an around the world trip, would it be English, or another language?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://foxnomad.com/2009/05/21/is-english-the-universal-language/#comment-43087">marina k. villatoro</a>.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a shame to miss out on the cultural perspective that a second language can give you &#8211; but is English the universal language? It is *the* language to know if you don&#8217;t?</p>
<p>Depends, of course, but if you could only use 1 language before setting off on an around the world trip, would it be English, or another language?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: marina k. villatoro		</title>
		<link>https://foxnomad.com/2009/05/21/is-english-the-universal-language/#comment-43087</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[marina k. villatoro]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 05:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foxnomad.com/?p=3405#comment-43087</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I agree with Soul Traveler, you need more than one language! I know it&#039;s come very useful for me on many occassions. 

Even though I&#039;m bilingual since 6 yrs old, I did learn spanish in my very late 20&#039;s so it&#039;s possible for everyone to learn enough to get your thoughts across and look that you took the time to learn that language.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Soul Traveler, you need more than one language! I know it&#8217;s come very useful for me on many occassions. </p>
<p>Even though I&#8217;m bilingual since 6 yrs old, I did learn spanish in my very late 20&#8217;s so it&#8217;s possible for everyone to learn enough to get your thoughts across and look that you took the time to learn that language.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anil Polat		</title>
		<link>https://foxnomad.com/2009/05/21/is-english-the-universal-language/#comment-42873</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anil Polat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 12:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foxnomad.com/?p=3405#comment-42873</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://foxnomad.com/2009/05/21/is-english-the-universal-language/#comment-42554&quot;&gt;Deniz&lt;/a&gt;.

Language usage, like you mention, is not the only export of English - it&#039;s the culture that goes along with it. Music, movies, art, as well as business and the Internet all help to make English a valuable commodity.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://foxnomad.com/2009/05/21/is-english-the-universal-language/#comment-42554">Deniz</a>.</p>
<p>Language usage, like you mention, is not the only export of English &#8211; it&#8217;s the culture that goes along with it. Music, movies, art, as well as business and the Internet all help to make English a valuable commodity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Deniz		</title>
		<link>https://foxnomad.com/2009/05/21/is-english-the-universal-language/#comment-42554</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deniz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 22:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foxnomad.com/?p=3405#comment-42554</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Being multi-lingual, I can say that English has always been, and will most likely always be the most useful language I know when traveling. And I do think it is THE universal language. Fluency in English is not needed for you to be understood or even for others to be understood, but where ever you go, there is always somebody who has learned a bit of English (whether traveling on or off of the &quot;tourist path&quot;). Believe me, I am a strong believer in the idea that in order to thoroughly understand people or a culture, you must understand their language but let&#039;s face it, globalization has made English THE universal language. You won&#039;t find Spanish or French speakers everywhere, but you will always find someone who either speaks English, knows English literature, or listens to American music. It&#039;s as simple as that.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being multi-lingual, I can say that English has always been, and will most likely always be the most useful language I know when traveling. And I do think it is THE universal language. Fluency in English is not needed for you to be understood or even for others to be understood, but where ever you go, there is always somebody who has learned a bit of English (whether traveling on or off of the &#8220;tourist path&#8221;). Believe me, I am a strong believer in the idea that in order to thoroughly understand people or a culture, you must understand their language but let&#8217;s face it, globalization has made English THE universal language. You won&#8217;t find Spanish or French speakers everywhere, but you will always find someone who either speaks English, knows English literature, or listens to American music. It&#8217;s as simple as that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: soultravelers3		</title>
		<link>https://foxnomad.com/2009/05/21/is-english-the-universal-language/#comment-42514</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[soultravelers3]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 18:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foxnomad.com/?p=3405#comment-42514</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://foxnomad.com/2009/05/21/is-english-the-universal-language/#comment-42509&quot;&gt;Anil Polat&lt;/a&gt;.

Sure, there are lots of ways to encourage it and listening to music in the 2nd language or watching shows with subtitles is certainly a help. Any kind of daily immersion helps.

BUT the reason why Swedes, Netherlands ( &#038; perhaps Turkey and other countries) are more motivated ( and have motivated parents that want the kids to be at least bilingual) is because they have native tongues that are not dominant languages today. 


A person in the UK/US can do more with their one language. A person in Spain, or Mexico or South America can do international business and go far without ever learning another language. I imagine this is true for Mandarin speakers and others, but no less about them.

A person in France or Portugal can also do international business without learning a second language. It is just as easy to go from German to English, but one finds MUCH less who do it in Germany than Scandinavia or Netherlands. I don&#039;t think it is the schooling as much as the motivation and size of the countries.

So need and motivation plays a huge role from what I have observed. Scandinavians see that English is a great advantage to them, but they are still much more comfortable in their native tongue and they usually will not talk in English unless they have to.( Typical of all people....we are most comfortable in our most used language). 

Most Dutch, speak English well, but are always so happy to speak in Dutch. We have Dutch plates on our RV so we see this constantly as they always come up to us speaking Dutch. Often times, they speak several languages well, partially by the location of their country.

My Swedish friend bought all the Harry Potter books in English because she could not wait until they were translated and she speaks English well. BUT, she also bought them in Swedish as soon as they were translated and enjoyed them more that way.

If one has a native tongue that is not a dominant language, one is much more motivated to really learn a language in depth because it often brings more success and opens more doors.

As you can see, I could talk about languages for ever. Now back to packing for our 7 months of traveling! ;)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://foxnomad.com/2009/05/21/is-english-the-universal-language/#comment-42509">Anil Polat</a>.</p>
<p>Sure, there are lots of ways to encourage it and listening to music in the 2nd language or watching shows with subtitles is certainly a help. Any kind of daily immersion helps.</p>
<p>BUT the reason why Swedes, Netherlands ( &amp; perhaps Turkey and other countries) are more motivated ( and have motivated parents that want the kids to be at least bilingual) is because they have native tongues that are not dominant languages today. </p>
<p>A person in the UK/US can do more with their one language. A person in Spain, or Mexico or South America can do international business and go far without ever learning another language. I imagine this is true for Mandarin speakers and others, but no less about them.</p>
<p>A person in France or Portugal can also do international business without learning a second language. It is just as easy to go from German to English, but one finds MUCH less who do it in Germany than Scandinavia or Netherlands. I don&#8217;t think it is the schooling as much as the motivation and size of the countries.</p>
<p>So need and motivation plays a huge role from what I have observed. Scandinavians see that English is a great advantage to them, but they are still much more comfortable in their native tongue and they usually will not talk in English unless they have to.( Typical of all people&#8230;.we are most comfortable in our most used language). </p>
<p>Most Dutch, speak English well, but are always so happy to speak in Dutch. We have Dutch plates on our RV so we see this constantly as they always come up to us speaking Dutch. Often times, they speak several languages well, partially by the location of their country.</p>
<p>My Swedish friend bought all the Harry Potter books in English because she could not wait until they were translated and she speaks English well. BUT, she also bought them in Swedish as soon as they were translated and enjoyed them more that way.</p>
<p>If one has a native tongue that is not a dominant language, one is much more motivated to really learn a language in depth because it often brings more success and opens more doors.</p>
<p>As you can see, I could talk about languages for ever. Now back to packing for our 7 months of traveling! 😉</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
